AI-readiness checks for
SEO specialists
A tool that supports your work
Check clients’ sites for AI readability, improve existing files and show the value of your work with data. Each source behind a check is linked.
First check free. No card required. About 90 seconds.
- 4
- AI engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude
- ~90 s
- for the check
- $0
- first check
Sources
What the checks rely on
with a link to each source
Each statement below links to the document it comes from.
FAQPage JSON-LD describes questions and answers in a form machines can read
Schema.org: FAQPageIn a controlled test (six LLMs, 252,000 trials, 18 content factors), explicit prices and a recent timestamp went with a higher chance of being cited first; formatting-only edits had little effect
Vishwakarma et al., arXiv:2605.25517 (preprint, not peer-reviewed; May 2026; checked 2026-10-11)On a benchmark of generative-engine queries, adding quotations, statistics and cited sources raised the share of the generated answer given to a source (the study’s own metric, 2023); keyword stuffing did not help
GEO paper (arXiv:2311.09735)Google documents structured data as a way to help it understand what a page is about
Google Search CentralPrimary sources:arXiv:2311.09735 (GEO Paper)arXiv:2605.25517Google Search Central
Use cases
How you can
use Causabi
Audit a new client
Enter a URL and get a score and a list of what to fix: robots.txt, schema.org, FAQ structure, content depth, brand signals, freshness, llms.txt, accessibility. Export the report and start from a concrete list.
A client brings someone else’s audit
Compare another tool’s report with the Causabi check and find what it left out. Propose a concrete fix backed by data instead of general advice.
Improve existing files
The site already has llms.txt, schema.jsonld or an FAQ block. Causabi shows what is wrong with them: outdated structure, incomplete coverage, wrong format. You fix only those parts.
Regular monitoring
Set up automatic checks of how often ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude name your client’s site for target queries. The report arrives on its own and shows the change between reports.
We follow the research
We follow the sources and update the checks
AI search changes fast, and what worked six months ago may no longer apply. We read new publications and adjust the checks accordingly.
We follow: Google Search Central, arXiv GEO papers.
- 4
- Primary sources
- 4
- AI engines
- ~90 s
- Check